Anytime Fitness - Pensacola, Florida

The Best Place for Fitness 24/7

Archive for November, 2009

Stress Raises Belly Fat, Heart Risks

November 17th, 2009

Study Shows Monkeys Under Long-Term Stress Put on Belly Fat, Get Heart Disease

By Daniel J. DeNoon
WebMD Health News

Aug. 6, 2009 – Monkeys fed an American diet get fat — but those under chronic stress put on much more belly fat.

That extra belly fat is why the stressed monkeys are much more likely to suffer blocked arteries and metabolic syndrome, a constellation of risk factors for heart disease, suggest Carol A. Shively, PhD, and colleagues at Wake Forest University.

In previous studies, Shively’s team showed that socially stressed monkeys — those at the bottom of the pecking order in a monkey colony — get blocked arteries far faster than other monkeys fed the same high-fat diet.

But why do stressed monkeys get more belly fat?

“We wanted to know more about how the stress outside of you gets turned into plaque inside of your arteries,” Shively tells WebMD. “So we looked at why stress caused atherosclerosis in our monkeys.”

Over a two-year period, Shively and colleagues collected a vast array of data on stressed and unstressed female cynomolgus monkeys. The studies included a CT scan to detect visceral fat — abdominal fat that often (but not always) protrudes as a “beer belly” on the outside. On the inside, it wraps around the organs.

Even compared to other monkeys with the same body mass index and weight, CT scans showed that the stressed monkeys had a great deal more belly fat. And when the researchers looked at the animals’ arteries, they found plaque clogging the arteries of the stressed monkeys.

“So it’s not how much fat you have, but where it is located,” Shively says.

During the years of the study, the low-status monkeys had high levels of a stress hormone called cortisol. Over time, high cortisol levels cause belly fat to accumulate. It also makes individual fat cells get larger.

This is “sick fat,” says Harold Bays, MD, medical director of the Louisville Metabolic and Atherosclerosis Research Center. Bays reviewed the Shively study for WebMD.

“Your body fat can become diseased like any other body tissue,” Bays says. “Your fat cells are getting bigger and your fat tissue is getting bigger and neither the cells nor the tissues work as well as they should. The fat is sick.”

“The monkeys that have a lot of abdominal fat have the metabolic syndrome, just like people with a lot of abdominal fat,” Shively says. “When you have lots more fat in visceral fat cells and all the characteristics of the metabolic syndrome, each of these things promotes atherosclerosis.”

Stress Strips Females of Heart Protection

All of the monkeys in the Shively study were female. One way monkeys are like humans is that females are less likely to get heart disease than males. Yet stressed female monkeys that put on belly fat are at least as likely to get heart disease as are male monkeys.

“So this is a good model for women with heart disease. When women get visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome, that completely abolishes the female protection,” Shively says. “Any edge they get for being female is totally gone. And in fact it may even be a worse disease for women than men, because they get complications and die faster when they have heart disease.”

Shively and colleagues found that the stressed monkeys had abnormal menstrual cycles. Compared to the unstressed monkeys, they were much less likely to ovulate. This was linked to abdominal fat — but not to body mass index or other kinds of fat.

“We don’t know about ovarian function in women with metabolic syndrome, but probably this is something we should look into,” Shively says. “Because the menstrual system protects against osteoporosis and loss of cognitive function. Depressed ovarian function in women is not a good thing.”

Bays says he’s not surprised by this finding.

“All these things are interconnected,” he says. “The central theme is it just shouldn’t be a mystery why, if you gain weight, you get metabolic disease.”

The Shively study appears in the current issue of the journal Obesity.

http://www.webmd.com/heart-disease/news/20090806/stress-ups-belly-fat-heart-risks?page=2

TV bombards children with commercials for high-fat and high-sugar foods

November 4th, 2009

As a father of 3 young boys this article really gets me thinking.  One point the article didn’t mention is that Nickelodeon, one of the children’s networks that is mentioned  is owned by Viacom who also owns several unhealthy foods that are advertised to our children.  As they grow older and start watching MTV they are marketed unhealthy food choices again and again Viacom owns MTV!

TV bombards children with commercials for high-fat and high-sugar foods

Children’s networks exposed young viewers to 76 percent more food commercials per hour than other networks

St. Louis, MO, November 4, 2009 – Childhood obesity in the United States is reaching epidemic proportions. With more than one fourth of advertising on daytime and prime time television devoted to foods and beverages and continuing questions about the role television plays in obesity, a study in the November/December issue of the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior examines how food advertising aimed at children might be a large contributor to the problem.

Researchers at the University of California-Davis examined the types of food advertisements seen by children watching English- and Spanish-language American television programs on Saturday mornings and weekday afternoons, which are high viewing times for children. Recordings were made of programs on twelve networks including highly rated children’s cable channels Nickelodeon, Cartoon Network, and Kids’ WB, networks that appeal to older youths (MTV, BET), mainstream English-language channels ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, and UPN, and Univision and Telemundo, the two highest rated Spanish language channels.

Out of 5,724 commercials recorded, 1,162 were food-related, with 91.2% of food promotions in English, and 8.7% in Spanish. Only 1 commercial was bilingual. Overall, nearly 1 in 5 advertisements was for a food or nutrition-related product, with 5.2 food advertisements presented every hour. Fast-food restaurants, sugary food, chips/crackers, and sugar-added beverages collectively accounted for more than 70% of food commercials; 34% were for ”food on the run,” fast-food restaurants and convenience food.

Children’s networks had the highest percentage of food-related commercials. Food advertisements were predominately for sugary cereals and sweets, high fat food, convenience or fast-food restaurant food, and chips/crackers. When compared to television for a general audience, children’s networks in this study exposed young viewers to 76% more food commercials per hour than did the other networks, with the Saturday morning 7-10 AM time slot being more saturated with food commercials. Approximately 7.7 food commercials per hour appeared in programming on the children’s networks, which is approximately 1 food commercial every 8 minutes

As children move into adolescence and begin to watch more youth programming, such as the music video programming offered by BET and MTV, they continue to be exposed to advertisements for food in less-healthful categories. Eighty percent of MTV food commercials were for fast food restaurants, sugar-added beverages, and sweets.

This is the first study of food advertising in Spanish-language American programming. Although the likelihood of an advertisement being for a food product did not differ between English- and Spanish- language networks, commercials on Spanish-language programming were more likely to be for alcohol and fast-food restaurants, which together account for a majority of the food commercials on these networks. These messages are being presented at a time when Hispanics in America are becoming increasingly obese.

In contrast, fruits, vegetables, and juices were advertised in only 1.7% of the commercials. Only one nutrition-related public service announcement was found for every 63 food ads.

Writing in the article, the authors state, “Study after study has documented the adverse health effects of food advertising targeting children and adolescents. Health educators need to develop and evaluate comprehensive nutrition programs that augment nutritional education with media use reduction strategies to lessen exposure to ads. School- and family-based programs that have attempted to reduce children’s media use have shown promise.

Reduced media use is insufficient by itself, for food advertising has increased in other types of media children use, such as the Internet. Thus efforts should also be made to introduce media literacy training into nutrition programs. Evaluations of nutrition-focused media literacy interventions have been rare. Such literacy training can help children and adolescents understand both the economic motivations behind food advertising and the strategies used by industry to increase desire for their products. Greater awareness of the potential influence of industry may immunize young people from food advertising’s deleterious effects.”

###

The article is “Frequency and Types of Foods Advertised on Saturday Morning and Weekday Afternoon English- and Spanish-Language American Television Programs” by Robert A. Bell, PhD; Diana Cassady, DrPH; Jennifer Culp, MPH, RD; and Rina Alcalay, PhD. It appears in the Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Volume 41, Issue 6, (November/December 2009) published by Elsevier.